NightVision vs. Snyk
Snyk scans your code and dependencies. NightVision attacks your running application and discovers the APIs nobody documented. Different layers, and one big gap if you only have Snyk.
Great at code and dependencies. Absent at runtime.
These are two different tools built for two different worlds. The question isn't which one is better; it's which one fits where you actually are.
Where Snyk excels
Snyk is a well-known developer security platform. Its SCA covers open-source dependency vulnerabilities, Snyk Code brings SAST into the IDE and PR, and container/IaC scanning round out the suite. For knowing what's in your code and dependencies, Snyk does that job.
Where it breaks down for dev teams
Snyk does not do real DAST or API discovery. Nothing in the platform tests your running application, validates exploitability, or finds the undocumented endpoints attackers probe first. Teams that standardize on Snyk alone have deep visibility into code and dependencies, and zero dynamic validation of what's actually exploitable in production-shaped conditions. That's the layer NightVision covers.
NightVision vs. Snyk: feature breakdown
A direct comparison across the dimensions that matter most for modern application security programs.
| Capability | NightVision | Snyk |
|---|---|---|
| Dynamic testing (DAST) of running apps | ✅ Core capability, 10-15 minute scans | ❌ Not offered |
| Undocumented API discovery | ✅ API eNVy™ generates specs from source in <20 seconds, then tests live | ❌ Not offered |
| Runtime exploitability validation | ✅ Every finding dynamically validated | ❌ Static findings only, no runtime proof |
| Open-source dependency scanning (SCA) | ⚠️ Not offered, pair with an SCA tool | ✅ Category leader |
| Static code analysis (SAST) | ⚠️ Static context used for traceback, not standalone SAST | ✅ Snyk Code, fast, IDE-integrated |
| Container / IaC scanning | ❌ Not offered | ✅ Included in platform |
| Findings pinpointed to code line | ✅ Yes, with runtime proof of exploitability | ✅ Yes, for static findings |
| CI/CD-native integration | ✅ Native: GitHub Actions, GitLab, Jenkins, Azure DevOps | ✅ Native, strong developer integrations |
| Developer self-serve | ✅ Onboarding in 6-12 clicks | ✅ Strong developer experience |
| Private network scanning | ✅ Smart proxy, zero infrastructure changes | ❌ N/A, doesn't scan running apps |
| Free tier | ✅ Free 3-day trial, no card required | ✅ Free tier for small teams |
| Pricing | ✅ From $15,000/year, transparent | ⚠️ Per-developer; grows with headcount |
What NightVision does that Snyk can't
These aren't feature checkboxes. They're the reasons security teams running CI/CD at scale are making the switch.
The layer Snyk doesn't touch
Snyk tells you what's in your code. NightVision proves what's exploitable in your running app: SQL injection, auth bypass, the OWASP Top 10 in live conditions.
APIs Snyk will never see
API eNVy™ discovers undocumented and shadow endpoints from source and tests them dynamically. No Snyk product covers this.
Runtime proof cuts static noise
Validated findings tell you which issues are real right now, the prioritization signal static scanners can't provide.
Same developer ergonomics
PR-native, minutes-fast, self-serve, the workflow Snyk users already expect, applied to dynamic testing.
Better together
Snyk for dependencies and code, NightVision for runtime and APIs. The overlap is zero; the coverage gap each fills is real.
Private network coverage
The smart proxy scans internal apps with zero infrastructure changes, relevant only to a tool that actually tests running apps.
The honest answer: it depends on your workflow.
✅ Choose NightVision when…
- You ship code daily and need security testing in every PR
- Your API surface includes undocumented or shadow APIs
- You want developers to run scans without a security engineer present
- You need to scan private-network apps without infrastructure changes
- You want findings tied to exact lines of code
- You need scalable, predictable pricing
- You already have SCA/SAST covered and need the dynamic layer
Consider Snyk when…
- Open-source dependency risk (SCA) is your primary concern
- You want SAST feedback inside the IDE and PR
- Container and IaC scanning are on your roadmap
- You have no DAST need (rare, but it happens)
"We won an award at our company's internal hackathon for demonstrating developer teams executing a DAST scan on a web app in eight minutes from start to finish during build time, with tickets opened automatically with Engineering."Steve McKinnon · Senior Application Security Engineer, BeyondTrust
Common questions about switching from Snyk
Does Snyk do DAST?
No, this is the core difference. Snyk's platform covers SCA (open-source dependencies), SAST (code analysis), container, and IaC scanning. It does not perform dynamic application security testing against a running app, and it has no API discovery. NightVision is a purpose-built DAST and API security platform.
Which of your tools actually validates exploitability at runtime?
NightVision. Snyk's findings are static, patterns in code, dependencies, and configs. NightVision attacks the running application and validates that findings are actually exploitable, then ties them to the exact file and line.
Do NightVision and Snyk compete or complement?
Mostly complement. Many teams run Snyk for dependency and code scanning and NightVision for dynamic testing and API discovery. Where they overlap is budget and the question of which findings deserve developer attention, validated runtime findings cut through static noise.
Can NightVision scan undocumented APIs?
Yes: API eNVy™ generates a complete OpenAPI spec from your source code in under 20 seconds, then dynamically tests every endpoint. Snyk has no equivalent capability.
Is NightVision developer-friendly like Snyk?
Yes. Like Snyk, NightVision is built for developer self-serve: onboarding in 6-12 clicks, scans on every PR, findings in the pull request. The difference is what's being tested, running apps and APIs rather than code and dependencies.
What does NightVision cost compared to Snyk?
NightVision starts at $15,000/year for the Single Application plan, with a free 3-day trial. Snyk has a free tier for small teams; paid plans are per-developer and grow with headcount. The two price on different axes since they test different things.
How NightVision compares to other tools
NightVision vs Burp Suite · NightVision vs Checkmarx · NightVision vs Invicti · NightVision vs StackHawk · NightVision vs Veracode · NightVision vs Bright Security · NightVision vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec · NightVision vs HCL AppScan · NightVision vs OWASP ZAP · NightVision vs Escape · NightVision vs 42Crunch · All comparisons
See the APIs you didn't know you had.
Run a free scan on one of your apps. No credit card. No sales call. Results in 10-15 minutes.